LABOUR MARKET TRANSFORMATION, INFORMAL EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SECURITY INCLUSION IN INDIA: EVIDENCE FROM PLFS,  CENSUS AND E-SHRAM DATA

Authors

  • Rajeev Kumar Rk – School Of Management Studies, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee University, Ranchi
  • Rajiv Kumar Hembram Rkh – Sona Devi University, Ghatsila, Jharkhand
  • Ganesh Chandra Baskey Gcb – University Department Of Zoology, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee University, Ranchi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/5vw6ft22

Keywords:

labour market, informal employment, social security, PLFS, Census 2011, e-Shram, India, unorganised workers, female labour force participation, decent work

Abstract

India’s labour market is undergoing a complex structural transformation characterized by rising labour force participation, persistent informal employment, and expanding social security initiatives. This study examines labour market participation, informal employment, and social security inclusion in India using secondary data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) 2017–18 to 2023–24, Census 2011 worker classification data, e-Shram administrative records, and supplementary evidence from the Annual Survey of Unincorporated Sector Enterprises (ASUSE). The study critically evaluates whether improvements in labour market indicators necessarily reflect improvements in employment quality and workforce security.

The findings reveal that the all-India Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR) increased from 49.8% in 2017–18 to 60.1% in 2023–24, while female LFPR rose substantially from 23.3% to 41.7%. However, the study finds that a large proportion of employment growth remains concentrated in informal, low-productivity, and socially unprotected work. Census-based evidence indicates that nearly 47.5% of rural female workers were classified as marginal workers, reflecting significant employment intermittency and workforce vulnerability. Informal employment continues to dominate the Indian labour market, accounting for a major share of self-employment, unpaid family work, and casual labour.

The paper further evaluates India’s e-Shram initiative through the identification–coverage–adequacy–utilisation framework for social protection. While the platform has achieved large-scale worker registration and administrative visibility for informal workers, substantial gaps remain regarding benefit utilisation, portability, adequacy, and independent impact evaluation. The study argues that labour market policy should move beyond headline participation and unemployment indicators toward a stronger focus on employment quality, workforce formalisation, social security accessibility, and sustainable labour governance.

The study contributes to business and management literature by integrating labour economics, workforce governance, employment sustainability, and social protection analysis within the context of India’s evolving labour market structure. The findings offer practical implications for policymakers, labour administrators, workforce planners, and social protection institutions seeking to improve employment quality, workforce resilience, and inclusive economic development.

References

1.Abraham, R. (2019). Informal employment and the structure of wages in India: A review of trends. Review of Income and Wealth, 65(S1), S102–S122. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12435

2.Azim Premji University. (2023). State of Working India 2023: Social Identities and Labour Market Outcomes. Centre for Sustainable Employment.

3.Barrientos, A., & Hulme, D. (Eds.). (2008). Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest: Concepts, Policies and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan.

4.Breman, J. (1996). Footloose Labour: Working in India's Informal Economy. Cambridge University Press.

5.Breman, J. (2013). At Work in the Informal Economy of India: A Perspective from the Bottom Up. Oxford University Press.

6.Chen, M. A. (2012). The Informal Economy: Definitions, Theories and Policies. WIEGO Working Paper No. 1. Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing.

7.Deshpande, A., & Singh, J. (2021). Dropping out, being pushed out or can't get in? Decoding declining labour force participation of Indian women. SSRN Electronic Journal. Dropping Out, Being Pushed Out or Can’t Get in? Decoding Declining Labour Force Participation of Indian Women

8.Goldin, C. (1994). The U-shaped female labor force function in economic development and economic history. In T. P. Schultz (Ed.), Investment in Women's Human Capital (pp. 61–90). University of Chicago Press.

9.Hart, K. (1973). Informal income opportunities and urban employment in Ghana. Journal of Modern African Studies, 11(1), 61–89.

10.International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2002). Decent Work and the Informal Economy. International Labour Conference, 90th Session, Report VI. ILO Publications.

11.International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2012). Social Protection Floors Recommendation (No. 202). ILO.

12.International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2013). Measuring informality: A statistical manual on the informal sector and informal employment. ILO Publications.

13.International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2018). Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture (3rd ed.). ILO Publications.

14.International Labour Organization. (2018). India Wage Report: Wage policies for decent work and economic growth.

15.Kannan, K. P., & Raveendran, G. (2012). Counting and profiling the missing labour force. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(6), 77–80.

16.Klasen, S., & Pieters, J. (2015). What explains the stagnation of female labor force participation in urban India? World Bank Economic Review, 29(3), 449–478.

17.Mehrotra, S., Gandhi, A., Saha, P., & Sahoo, B. K. (2014). Joblessness and informality: Reflections on 2004–05 to 2009–10. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(6), 30–38.

18.Mehrotra, S., & Parida, J. K. (2017). Why is the labour force participation of women declining in India? World Development, 98, 360–380.

19.Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation [MoSPI], Government of India. (2024). Periodic Labour Force Survey Annual Report 2023–24: Press Note. MoSPI.

20.Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation [MoSPI], Government of India. (2025). Annual Survey of Unincorporated Sector Enterprises (ASUSE) 2025: Key Results. Press Information Bureau.

21.Mishra, A. K. (2014). Safety net measures for unorganised workers in India: Critical gaps and challenges. Social Change, 44(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049085714526278

22.The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (2022) technical documentation outlines

23.National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector [NCEUS]. (2009). The Challenge of Employment in India: An Informal Economy Perspective (Vol. 1). NCEUS.

24.Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. (2011). Primary Census Abstract 2011: India and States/UTs. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. https://data.gov.in

25.Press Information Bureau [PIB], Government of India. (2025a). Social Security Coverage for Unorganised and Migrant Workers. Ministry of Labour and Employment.

26.Press Information Bureau [PIB], Government of India. (2025b). e-Shram One-Stop-Solution: Integration of Welfare Schemes. Ministry of Labour and Employment.

27.Press Information Bureau [PIB], Government of India. (2026, January). Social Security for Gig and Platform Workers: Aggregator Module Launch. Ministry of Labour and Employment.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25