ROLE OF UNIVERSITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES IN SHAPING EMPLOYEE WORK PERFORMANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69980/2277b881Keywords:
University Infrastructure, Employee Performance, Workplace Facilities, Human Resource ManagementAbstract
In higher education institutions, employee performance is influenced by multiple organisational factors, among which infrastructure plays a crucial yet often underexplored role. Understanding how infrastructure shapes work outcomes is essential for improving institutional effectiveness. This study examines the role of university infrastructure and facilities in shaping employee work performance, with a specific focus on classifying infrastructure components as performance enablers or constraints. A quantitative descriptive research design was adopted, and primary data were collected through a structured 5-point Likert scale questionnaire administered to 56 teaching and non-teaching staff members from private universities in Pune city. The data were analysed using descriptive statistical techniques, including mean scores, percentage distribution, and frequency analysis. The findings indicate that key infrastructure components, such as modern teaching aids (Mean = 4.59), access to computing resources (Mean = 4.30), and functional administrative spaces (Mean = 4.29), act as strong enablers of employee performance by enhancing efficiency and productivity. In contrast, factors such as storage facilities (Mean = 3.70), parking (Mean = 3.73), and grievance redressal systems (Mean = 3.89) function as moderate enablers with the potential to become constraints if not effectively managed. Additionally, salary satisfaction emerged as an important contextual factor, with relatively low mean scores (≈2.79–2.91), indicating its influence on employee motivation and overall performance. The study highlights that infrastructure is a dynamic organisational factor whose impact depends on its quality, accessibility, and alignment with employee needs, emphasising the importance of integrating infrastructure development with supportive HR practices.decisions and align engagement strategies with sustainability objectives.
References
1.Ahmad, I., Ullah, K., & Khan, A. (2021). The impact of green HRM on green creativity: Mediating role of pro-environmental behaviors and moderating role of ethical leadership style. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33.
2.Almita, A., Tahir, M., & Hajjad, M. N. (2023). Employee performance and the impact of workplace facilities and discipline. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 10(2), 417–425.
3.Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
4.Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of occupational health psychology, 22(3), 273.
5.Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
6.Boahen, P. A. N., Duah, E., Ababio, E. O., & Appiah-Kubi, E. (2023). Work environment and employee productivity: The role of job satisfaction. European Journal of Business and Management, 15(19), 51–58.
7.Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied psychology, 86(3), 499.
8.Gifford, J., & Wietrak, E. (2022). People performance: An evidence review. Practice summary and recommendations. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
9.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
10.Herzberg, F. I. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man.
11.Jain, R. An Empirical Analysis of Job Satisfaction in Higher Education Institutes: A Study of Faculty at Ludhiana.
12.Lee, D. Y., & Jo, Y. (2023). The job demands-resource model and performance: the mediating role of employee engagement. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1194018.
13.Nguyen, C. N., Tho, A., & Nguyen, T. B. (2024). Understanding generation Z’s job engagement and performance in generationally diverse workplace. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science-Economics and Business Administration, 14(2), 93-108.
14.Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory 3rd edition (MacGraw-Hill, New York).
15.Ogunode, N. J., & Akpakwu, F. O. (2023). Impact of Infrastructure facilities on academic staff job performance in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria. International Journal of Inclusive and Sustainable Education, 2(12), 51-59.
16.Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. john wiley & sons.
17.Tahir, M., & Hajjad, M. F. N. (2023). Employee performance and the impact of workplace facilities and discipline. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 10(2), 417-425.
18.Yuniarti, Y. (2022). The Effect of Education and Training Program, Facilities and Infrastructure Completeness, Organizational Support on Employee Performance Through Satisfaction as Variable Mediation. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(2).



