HOW DO BEHAVIOURAL BIASES INFLUENCE ASSET PRICING AND THE EFFICIENCY OF FINANCIAL MARKETS?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/eijbms.v11i1.204Keywords:
Financial markets, Behavioural Biases, Risk Management, AssetsAbstract
This paper investigates how behavioural biases influence asset pricing and financial market efficiency. Classical finance theory conceptualizes the EMH; it assumes financial markets to be rational, with the efficient market passing on all available information to reflect prices. However, where behavioural finance does oppose this assumption is in its acceptance of the presence of psychological factors leading to deviations from rational decision-making. This paper looks at the traditional behavioural biases that, in common sense, lead to decisions on the part of investors with an overview or projection of how asset prices will behave. Price bubbles, excessive volatility, and mispricing of assets all emerge as market anomalies, so opportunities to exploit inefficiency are created. As indicated by the other writer's works and empirical studies, it describes how biases due to behaviour run through an investor's perception and behaviour and how it causes inefficient pricing mechanisms to develop. It also analyzes the influence of these biases in matters related to asset allocation, risk management, and market stability. The research suggests while behavioural biases limit any normal economic functioning of the market, acknowledging and understanding these behavioural biases could present numerous opportunities to formulate more impressive investment options and policy interventions for a better working market
References
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000). Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. SSRN Electronic Journal , 2. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.219228
Berwal, R. (2017). Financial Inclusion in India: Role of RBI. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(7). https://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0717/ijsrp-p6755.pdf
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026.
Bikhchandani, S., & Sharma, S. (2001). Herd Behaviour in Financial Markets: A Review. SSRN Electronic Journal, 47(3). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.228343
de Mel, S., McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2008). Returns to Capital in Microenterprises: Evidence from a Field Experiment*. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1329–1372. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1329
Diether, M., Scherbina, Chen, H., & Stein ; Du⁄e, G. (1969). DotCom Mania: The Rise and Fall of Internet Stock Prices. THE JOURNAL of FINANCE, LVIII(3). https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~eofek/DotComMania_JF_Final.pdf
Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
JEGADEESH, N., & TITMAN, S. (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: an Analysis of Decision under Risk. https://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Behavioural_Decision_Theory/Kahneman_Tversky_1979_Prospect_theory.pdf
Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001). The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149–1187. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265543
Paúl, H., & Natarajan, S. (2023). Behavioural Biases and their Influence on Investment Decision-Making: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. JOURNAL of LAW and SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 11(4), e904–e904. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i4.904
Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Psycnet.apa.org. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03730-000
Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2001). The Venture Capital Revolution. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 145–168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2696596